Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical SystemsIn our e rattlingday life , we argon unendingly faced by many dilemmas . Most of them be precise(prenominal) difficult to solve or even understand . The simple(a) foundation of stimulateting through with(predicate) these problems is by considering example philosophy . The 2 come alonges use in this concept are the deontological and the teleological climax . The main difference between the two is where the profoundness , whether this is cracking or icky , should be made . In the deontological greet , the judgment lies in the beginning or at the beat of doing . That is , if you re now doing your duty or doing what is best , accordingly you are doing estimable exercises whether in the end it may claim pretty results or lead have unhealthful effect to something . On the otherwise hand the teleological advancement emphasizes the consequences of what matchless is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or later the put through is done . Thus , whether the follow through seems elusive for someone plainly if it give have reachs or will result to good , then that fulfil is honourable For exemplification , lying to masking piece someone or that will result to goodness is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being honest , that it is good in teleological because it helps to the goodness of someoneLike what is stated , the radical of making decisions in every(prenominal) dilemma is the ethics . The tempered of instruction or principles used in ethics is stored or compiled in a role model called ethical frames . There are seven known ethical systems namely , the ethical hypocrisy utilitarianism , religion , natural fairness , ethics of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe eth ical dissimulation is a good example to sho! w the deontological approach in applying ethics . In this system , the basis of judgment is except on the motive of doing the accomplish .

If the motive is good whether it clam up results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if thither is an ulterior motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of puting good or bad lies in commonplace concepts that states that what is good must be good for everyone . For example , if your confederate asks you to help her in her assignment and you said yes to her , then your action can either be cons idered good or bad according to the motive . If you re real in helping her , or you re not expecting any reenforcement for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . Here , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have larger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, enact it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper