'Ethics Essay\r'

'The fibre study of Jerry McCall, one of the checkup exam encourageants in Dr. William’s line, describes one of the legion(predicate) challenges that occur on a insouciant basis plot working in a doctor’s office. at that place are m whatsoever different levels of ply present in an office that set about an array of different hypothecate duties and tele reachings of practice. Jerry was presented with a long-suffering of that was in desire of a prescription drug catch up with full on a medication that he is not allowed to anesthetize without direct authorization from the doctor. Unfortunately for Jerry he was covering a lunch pl beneath and the only one in the office at that time.\r\n on that point are a number of different honorable purposes that Jerry is go about with in which we end point cover below. Jerry’s medical exam training as a medical assistant does not acknowledge the release of either type of replenish of prescription medica tions without the authorization or steerage from the doc. The scope of practice for a medical assistant includes performing â€Å"administrative and received clinical duties under the caution of physician. administrative duties whitethorn include scheduling appointments, maintaining medical records, billing, and coding for insurance purposes.\r\nClinical duties may include taking and recording springy signs and medical histories, preparing patients for examination, drawing blood, and administering medications as say by physician” (Medical Assistant joke Description, 1997-2013). It is also stated in the case study that Jerry is a Licensed hardheaded Nurse, which is also only to refill a prescription under the direction of the physician. Would it wreak a distinction if the medication bespeak were for control of high blood insisting that the patient criti betokeny of necessity on a daily basis?\r\nThere should not be a difference between what types of medications Jerr y is asked to authorize to refill for a patient. This type of duty is not bring out of the medical assistant’s scope of practice. There are other alternatives that Jerry brush aside turn to in order to problem-solve this site that pull up stakes be discussed below. If Jerry calls in the refill and the patient has an adverse reaction while flying, is Jerry protected from a lawsuit under the precept of respondent superior?\r\nThe doctrine of respondent superior is a â€Å" statutory doctrine most commonly utilize in tort, that holds an employer or principal de jure responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee or agent, if such acts occur indoors the scope of the workout or agency” (Cornell University Law School, 2010). This is stating that the physician is also responsible and alonet be held responsible for the actions of Jerry. Jerry must practice within the scope of practice set for medical assistants and within his job description.\r\nThe physician ca n be held liable by the patient and can concur charges pressed on him based on this doctrine. The advice I would have for Jerry is to make sure he is tone at this situation as if it were the presidential term board for medical assistants looking at the same resultant. He should not make a closing that is above his job description and out of his scope of practice. This could seduce serious problems leading to Jerry possible losing his job. Jerry has a code of morality that he require to abide. The patient’s safety should be what Jerry is concerned with.\r\nMajor legal and ethical issues that may affect Jerry’s decision are very clear in this situation. If Jerry authorizes this prescription without the physician’s direction he is practicing outside of his scope as a medical assistant and will lose not only his job, but his license. Ethically, he is knowingly performing an outlawed act and can be held accountable for this in a court of law. slightly prob lem-solving methods that might be helpful to assist in making an ethical decision are for Jerry to review his code of ethics.\r\nThis will educate Jerry that â€Å"the code of ethics of American Association of Medical Assistants shall set forth principles of ethical and moral conduct as they relate to the medical profession and the incident practice of medical assisting, render assist with full respect for the dignity of humanity, and concern the honor and high principles of the profession and bandage out its disciplines” (Fremgen, 2009, p. 328). Another ethical way to problem-solve this issue it to simply call the physician to permit him know this patient is in need of a refill which needs to be called in as soon as possible for the patient.\r\nThis will place the state back to the physician where it should be. Jerry should instruct the patient that authorizing a refill without the physician’s direction is against the law, and Jerry will notify the physician r ight away to make him certified of the patient’s needs. In conclusion, Jerry should stick to his code of ethics as a medical assistant and handle the prescription dilemma as any medical assistant should do within his scope of practice.\r\nJerry should also take into consideration that any ethical decisions he makes can result in the physician he plant for being held accountable for Jerry’s actions. The advice for Jerry to call the physician to make him aware of the patients needs would allow him to make the best ethical and legal decision available. Like any working professional, Jerry is held to a code of ethics that he took a vow to uphold, and should think this when dealing with the safety of any patient.\r\n'