A Refutation of the Descent of Man from Apes Essay

Perhaps fifty-fifty forrader the time of Darwin, musical composition had already started asking himself where he had come from, and in some way the Theory of Divine Creation that man was rather created as himself and has non descended from any other animal proved to be rather low as a operator to explain his roots. Scientific studies later on proved that there are several homologies portiond by man and apes and the question remains as to whether man has consequentlyce descended from this group of order Primates called apes. However, despite the obvious akinities between the both species, the results of this investigation say otherwise.The Proofs against the suppositional Descent of small-arm from the Apes The Common Ancestor. It is claimed that human race didnt evolve from apesbut that humans share a common ancestor with modern African apes, like gorillas and chimpanzees (Where We Came From, 2001). The causation therefore for the confusableities and the homologous morphological and anatomical characteristics between humans and apes whitethorn non be exactly due to the fact that the first descended from the fleck but that they could average be of the same ancestor.In a similar way, when you see similarities between twain people of different ages, you cannot immediately conclude that the older one has begotten the other but that they could be two siblings. In logic, one can say that just because A looks similar to B, it does not necessarily mean that A has descended or originated from B, although we cannot deny that indeed there is some connection. In short, the claim that humans descended from apes whitethorn just hold up been one speculation or guess ground on morphological bear witness, which may prove to be weak.This common ancestor is believed to realise existed 5 to 8 million years ago and shortly thereafter, the species diverged into two separate lineages (Where We Came From, 2001). There guide been claims that the ape or gori lla lineage branched strike 1. 6 to 2. 2 million years earlier than did the human-chimpanzee divergence (Chen & adenine Li, 2001), making humans even closer to chimpanzees than apes. The term organic evolutionists have precondition to this so-called common ancestor of humans and apes is known as genus Australopithecus, which means South African ape (Hasnain, 2009).The theory of the common ancestor has been back by several studies which stated that either mitochondrial DNA (Ferris, Wilson & international ampere Brown, 1983) or the extremely close immunological resemblance between the serum albumins of apes and man. (Sarich & Wilson, 1967) The problem, however, is that it could be that this theory is not that plausible after it was found that the beings called Australopithecus in this imaginary scenario fabricated by evolutionists really are apes that became extinct (Hasnain, 2009).If the Australopithecus had actually not existed, then it could be that man has really descende d from apes owing to the homology in their physical structures. focussed Evolution. The homology in the morphology of humans and apes is, however, not a strong guarantee that the first have descended from the second. It is tell that the resemblance in the skeleton structure of apes and humans has always served as strong evidence for common ancestry (Evolution of Man, 2010).It is however a poor assumption that similarity means relatedness, which means that two species can have homologous anatomy even though they are not related in any way (Evolution of Man, 2010). This is known as convergent evolution. Convergent evolution t from each onees one that two species which are distinctly unrelated from each other could have just have developed separately and at times coincidentally produced similarities in morphology.In a similar way, based on pure simple logic, it does not necessarily mean that two people are related just simply because they look similar, even very similar. Menton (200 2) states that these similarities may have just been due to an incredible engage of countless lucky mutational coincidences. This simply means that it could have been that it is a mere coincidence that humans and apes look alike. Deductive Logic. Robinson (2005) argues that If humans evolved from apes, then one would expect that there would be no apes left on earth all would have evolved into humans. This statement simply means that since evolution propels a species to change, and if it is true that apes have evolved into humans, then there simply seems no logical explanation as to why several apes nowadays have not evolved into humans. Nevertheless, this claim could be refuted by the theory that certain species of animals may not have evolved because of their ecological niche. This means that certain apes in the hobo camp may not have evolved into humans due to the fact that the originator are arboreal. Conclusion Man has not descended from apes.This is proven by scientifically- based claims that have established the existence of a common ancestor. Another proof is that the evolution of both humans and apes was merely convergent. Lastly, deductive logic disproves it. At this caput in time, scientific searches on the evolution of man and apes have not been able to completely shed light on the possibility or impossibility of mans descent from their primate brothers. Further research is therefore highly recommended.References Chen, F. C. & Li, W. H. (Nov 1985). Subliminal messages Between the devil and the media. The the Statesn Journal of Human Genetics, 6, 444-456.Retrieved may 19, 2010, from the Cell database http//www. cell. com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929707640968 Evolution of Man What is it?. Science. (2010). Retrieved may 18, 2010 from the AllAboutScience. org website http//www. allaboutscience. org/evolution-of-man. htm Ferris, S. D. , Wilson, A. C. , & Brown, W. M. (Apr 1981). Evolutionary Tree for Apes and Humans based on Cleavage Maps of Mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 78, 2432-2436. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America database http//www.pnas. org/content/78/4/2432. full. pdf+html? sid=768efdca-ce15-463a-959d-dd9fbbf7e9d1 Hasnain. Did Men and Apes Come from a Common Ancestor?. Food for Thought Thought Provoking Articles. (26 Jan 2009). Retrieved May 18, 2010 from the Hasnains Life website http//hasnain. wordpress. com/2009/01/26/did-men-and-apes-come-from-a-common-ancestor/ Menton, D. N. , Ph. D. If We Resemble Apes, Does That Mean We Evolved from Apes?. Origin of Man. (2002). Retrieved May 18, 2010 from the Missouri Association for Creation website http//www. gennet. org/facts/metro05. html