Dredd Scott Essays - Slavery In The United States,

Dredd Scott Dredd Scott America in 1857 was a nation on the brink. Relationship between the North and South had been strained for decades and was only getting worse. All tension had to do with the issues of slavery. In 1848 the U.S. had acquired new lands in the Mexican cession, and the debate was on. The question was whether or not the South should be allowed to spread slavery into the new states. This debate turned violent many times. The South threatened to secede from the Union if a candidate from the Republican party, who was antislavery, won. Amidst all of the tension would emerge a slave named Dredd Scott. Dredd Scott was a slave to Dr. John Emerson in St.Louis, Missouri a slave state. Scott spent most of his time in Illinois, a free state, because his owner Dr. Emerson was an Army doctor and he stayed in Fort Armstrong in Illinois. Living in a free state had constituted freedom for previous slaves so Scott felt that he too deserved his freedom and he brought his first case to court on April 6, 1846, at this time he had moved back to Missouri and was the property of Dr. Emersons wife. Scott filed a declaration on April 6, 1846,which stated that Mrs. Emerson had beat, bruised and ill treated him before imprisoning him for twelve hours. He declared that he was to be free on the basis that he had lived of Fort Armstrong and Fort Snelling which were both located in free states. Scott felt that he had a strong case as the Supreme Court of Missouri had freed slaves previous to him who had also traveled with their masters to free states. Scott lost the first case and brought the case up again in 1850 to the Supreme Court of Missouri, the same court which had freed slaves previous on the same terms. The difference now was that two of the three justices serving on the court were pro-slavery whereas in cases prior to Scott vs. Emerson the Justices had a more apathetic view of slavery and saw it as a neccesary evil. The court ruled against Scott in 1852 and once again his attempt at freedom had failed. His next step was to take his case into the federal judicial system as he brought it to the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. The Scott case would be very different when entered into the federal court however. First Scott had a new owner who was John F.A. Sanford, the brother of Mrs. Emerson. Once again Scotts attempt failed based on Sanfords argument that Scott had regained his slave status when he returned to Missouri and therefor was a slave and had no right to seek freedom. This was not Scotts final attempt at freedom however. He decided to take his case to the highest court in the nation. Before proceeding to the Supreme Court with his case Dredd Scott found a lawyer to represent his cause. The lawyer that took his case was a man named, Montgomery Blair, a fellow Missourian. Blair was a highly respected lawyer in Washington, and was an anti-slavery supporter. He also agreed to take Scotts defense at no charge. The case had a huge political impact at this time and was delayed one year in order to avoid debates about the controversial topic in the election of 1856. Scotts case had not attracted much attention until it reached the Supreme Court. The Scott case renewed debate over slavery issues and also the debate over whether Congress had the power to regulate slavery. Both the republican and Democratic parties agreed that the slavery issue should rest in the arms of the Supreme Court. When the Supreme Court met for the first time on the case on February 14, 1857, it favored the previous courts decision that ruled in favor of Mr. Sanford. Yet this case opened other arguments such as Negro citizenship and the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise. When these issues were heard in court the court elected Chief Justice Roger B. Taney to represent the majority decision in the court. The court battle lasted nearly a month and on March 6, 1857, the court had reached a decision. The first decision addressed by Roger Taney was whether or not Scott even had a right to bring this case to court. Taney stated that, one of the privileges reserved for citizens of the United States was the privilege of